RequestHunt is a community-driven platform that collects and curates feature requests from X (Twitter), Reddit, and GitHub. We help product teams discover what features real users are asking for, making it easier to validate product ideas and prioritize feature development based on actual user demand.

How does RequestHunt collect feature requests?

RequestHunt uses AI-powered extraction to automatically collect feature requests from social media platforms including X, Reddit, and GitHub. The platform monitors discussions, issues, and posts to identify genuine user feature requests, extracting key information like the requested feature, product mentioned, and user sentiment.

Who uses RequestHunt?

RequestHunt is used by product managers, founders, developers, and product teams who want to discover what features real users are requesting. It's particularly valuable for startups looking to validate ideas, established companies prioritizing their roadmap, and developers building products that solve real user problems.

Is RequestHunt free to use?

Yes, browsing and searching feature requests on RequestHunt is completely free. We also offer API access for developers who want to integrate feature request data into their own applications. Check our pricing page for API plan details.

How often is RequestHunt data updated?

RequestHunt continuously collects feature requests from Reddit, X (Twitter), and GitHub. You can also trigger on-demand scraping via the API or web interface to get the freshest data for any topic.

[Claude Code] Auto-address issues and merge PRs

User asks if the PR review tool will not only review but also address identified issues and merge the PR to the main branch, seeing this as a way to reduce the PR bottleneck from AI-generated PRs.

Original Source

@John Crickett | 326 pts

Claude Code PR reviews are here, just $15–$25 a pop. I’m finding it hard to believe it’s worth it. Here’s what they said: "We've been running Code Review internally for months: on large PRs (over 1,000 lines changed), 84% get findings, averaging 7.5 issues. On small PRs under 50 lines, that drops to 31%, averaging 0.5 issues. Engineers largely agree with what it surfaces: less than 1% of findings are marked incorrect.” And yes, the stats sound good. It’s finding issues with very low false positive rates. But here's my concern, Anthropic has been dogfooding this internally for months. Meanwhile there are 3493 open Github issues classified as bugs against Claude Code today. I‘m finding bugs myself. I just can’t get Claude Code’s remote control feature to work for more than a few minutes at a time and from discussing it with others, I’m not alone. If their own tool can't keep their own product stable, what exactly are you paying $15–$25 a review for? I’m not convinced this is ready for teams shipping 10+ PRs a day. What do you think?

Discussion

Loading comments...