Loading request...
The user suggests that if games were cheaper or had better discounts for people who regularly buy games, people would buy more. They reference Steam's successful model for this, contrasting it with Sony's current 'dynamic pricing' which is perceived negatively.
I am genuinely curious for ANY POSITIVE CASE SCENARIO that can be derived from this. I mean any good business will always look for ways to make money by selling games, so making people buy more game is the obvious move. Right ? This is something Lord Gabe and Steam understood years ago, and honestly it has been one of the best things to happen to modern gaming \- If games are cheaper or if there are better discounts for people who regularly buy games, people will buy more. **I know I would**. *Steam already proved how well this works. Our monke brains see a big discount and we forget about the 299 games already sitting in our backlog and buy 10 more during a sale.* So whatever testing Sony is doing with dynamic pricing across accounts, I doubt this is rocket science. The formula is already proven. STOP IT SONY. Edit: I literally don’t get this mindset. People out here defending a multi-billion-dollar company like corporations haven’t been using the term “dynamic pricing" FOR YEARS to squeeze more money out of the public. Take all information with a PINCH OF SALT. Maybe it will be fine. Maybe it won’t. But the whole reason people speak up early and get vocal on social media is so companies notice the backlash and adjust BEFORE the system becomes permanent. As if Uber, food delivery, airlines, greedy companies have been donating money to us in the name 'special algorithm' 'dynamic pricing'