Loading request...
Users who introduce new powerful health interventions (e.g., peptides, TRT) need a way to re-evaluate and potentially reduce or optimize their existing supplement stack. A feature that helps analyze the overlap or redundancy of supplements with new treatments, and suggests adjustments based on observed performance/recovery changes, would prevent unnecessary intake and cost.
To avoid confusion: on a photo is about 30 days of supplements. Are you guys still taking supplements after starting peptides? I just finished about a month on KLOW (prescription from a compounding pharmacy), and the changes were not what I expected ( but much better). Skin looks better, shoulder pain is gone, and my training capacity went up a lot. I can run, swim, and lift longer and at higher intensity. Rough estimate is around 2 to 2.5x more total training volume compared to before. Because of that, I’m starting to question whether my supplement stack still makes sense. Before this, I was pretty consistent with a standard stack like GlyNAC, vitamin D, berberine, magnesium, TMG, creatine, astaxanthin. Not extreme, but definitely not minimal either. Now it feels like peptides are doing most of the heavy lifting, especially for recovery and performance, so I’m trying to understand if the supplements are still adding anything meaningful or just marginal on top. Also trying to sanity check this angle: does this kind of peptide-driven improvement resemble what people describe on TRT, where things feel better and performance goes up, but underlying issues may still be there and you’re just pushing the system harder? Curious how others think about this, especially if you’ve reduced your stack or tracked changes before vs after