RequestHunt is a community-driven platform that collects and curates feature requests from X (Twitter), Reddit, and GitHub. We help product teams discover what features real users are asking for, making it easier to validate product ideas and prioritize feature development based on actual user demand.

How does RequestHunt collect feature requests?

RequestHunt uses AI-powered extraction to automatically collect feature requests from social media platforms including X, Reddit, and GitHub. The platform monitors discussions, issues, and posts to identify genuine user feature requests, extracting key information like the requested feature, product mentioned, and user sentiment.

Who uses RequestHunt?

RequestHunt is used by product managers, founders, developers, and product teams who want to discover what features real users are requesting. It's particularly valuable for startups looking to validate ideas, established companies prioritizing their roadmap, and developers building products that solve real user problems.

Is RequestHunt free to use?

Yes, browsing and searching feature requests on RequestHunt is completely free. We also offer API access for developers who want to integrate feature request data into their own applications. Check our pricing page for API plan details.

How often is RequestHunt data updated?

RequestHunt continuously collects feature requests from Reddit, X (Twitter), and GitHub. You can also trigger on-demand scraping via the API or web interface to get the freshest data for any topic.

RequestHunt

Loading request...

[Geforce Now] Improve auto-bandwidth detection to reduce streaming artifacts | RequestHunt

[Geforce Now] Improve auto-bandwidth detection to reduce streaming artifacts

| | , , ,

by @u/Macusercom | 3/5/2026 | submitted by AutoCollector

[view original source]

When using Geforce Now, the auto-bandwidth setting often results in noticeable streaming artifacts. Users need to manually crank up bandwidth to 100 Mbps to reduce these, suggesting the auto-detection could be improved to provide a clearer image at varying connection speeds.

Original Source

@u/Macusercom | 0 pts | 3/5/2026

Since Linus and Luke discussed the future being PCs in the cloud only with personal gaming PCs dying out, I do have to say that cloud gaming in 2026 is really impressive. I have opted for a one month GeForce Now subscription as I'm traveling alone for work. Wife would not be happy taking the Switch 2 and I only have a MacBook Pro and a desktop gaming PC. Sure, I could've set up Moonlight and Sunshine for streaming but given how far away it is from home, 30-40 ms latency would be surely bad for Battlefield 6 or CS2. Also, if something went wrong, I need to hope that someone is at home to fix it. Having tested multiple scenarios, setups, resolutions, Wi-Fi vs ethernet etc. it is really impressive what game streaming can pull off. I do notice the 20 ms latency but it is very minor. Especially with 120 fps it feels like using a Bluetooth mouse, but not like if I was gaming on a server 1000 km away. Even with macOS (apart from needing to disable AWDL on Wi-Fi) it immediately works. It was fine even when playing Battlefield 6 on my Fold 7 using a mouse and a keyboad. Mouse sensitivity is the same, settings can be the same if you choose to and you get used to \~20 ms latency very quickly. Is it ideal? Of course not but in situations like traveling or if your GPU died, cloud gaming on an iGPU is a viable option. Setting the bandwidth to auto still shows a lot of artifacts but if you crank it up to 100 Mbps it gets hard to notice even for someone like me who teaches audio/video encoding at university. Despite not wanting another subscription and still holding on to a local gaming PC for dear life, I do think cloud gaming is gaining up traction. Setting aside availability and convenience, € 25 a month for the Ultimate plan is much more realistic for a student than € 1000+ for a PC. **TL;DR** Cloud gaming is really good and practical in certain scenarios, but subscriptions...

Discussion

Loading comments...