RequestHunt is a community-driven platform that collects and curates feature requests from X (Twitter), Reddit, and GitHub. We help product teams discover what features real users are asking for, making it easier to validate product ideas and prioritize feature development based on actual user demand.

How does RequestHunt collect feature requests?

RequestHunt uses AI-powered extraction to automatically collect feature requests from social media platforms including X, Reddit, and GitHub. The platform monitors discussions, issues, and posts to identify genuine user feature requests, extracting key information like the requested feature, product mentioned, and user sentiment.

Who uses RequestHunt?

RequestHunt is used by product managers, founders, developers, and product teams who want to discover what features real users are requesting. It's particularly valuable for startups looking to validate ideas, established companies prioritizing their roadmap, and developers building products that solve real user problems.

Is RequestHunt free to use?

Yes, browsing and searching feature requests on RequestHunt is completely free. We also offer API access for developers who want to integrate feature request data into their own applications. Check our pricing page for API plan details.

How often is RequestHunt data updated?

RequestHunt continuously collects feature requests from Reddit, X (Twitter), GitHub, YouTube, LinkedIn, and Amazon. You can also trigger on-demand scraping via the API or web interface to get the freshest data for any topic.

[IDP Leaderboard] Create a results explorer for document AI

User suggests building a results explorer that shows ground truth alongside model predictions in the IDP Leaderboard to help users decide which model works for them.

Original Source

@u/shhdwi | 5 pts | 3/11/2026

We're releasing the IDP Leaderboard, an open evaluation framework for document understanding tasks. 16 models tested across OlmOCR, OmniDoc, and our own IDP Core benchmark (covering KIE, table extraction, VQA, OCR, classification, and long document processing). Key results: \- Gemini 3.1 Pro leads overall (83.2) but the margin is tight. Top 5 within 2.4 points. \- Cheaper model variants (Flash, Sonnet) produce nearly identical extraction quality to flagship models. The differentiation only appears on reasoning-heavy tasks like VQA. \- GPT-5.4 shows a significant jump over GPT-4.1 (70 to 81 overall, 42% to 91% on DocVQA). \- Sparse unstructured tables remain the hardest task. Most models are below 55%. \- Handwriting OCR tops out at 76%. We also built a Results Explorer that shows ground truth alongside every model's raw prediction for every document. Not just scores. This helps you decide which model works for you by actually seeing the predictions and the ground truths. Findings: [https://nanonets.com/blog/idp-leaderboard-1-5/](https://nanonets.com/blog/idp-leaderboard-1-5/) Datasets: [huggingface.co/collections/nanonets/idp-leaderboard](http://huggingface.co/collections/nanonets/idp-leaderboard) Leaderboard + Results Explorer: [idp-leaderboard.org](http://idp-leaderboard.org)

Discussion

Loading comments...