Improve migration support for transitioning to European cloud providers

@GlobalUpdates24 Europe's goal of cloud sovereignty, which means finding local alternatives to U.S. hyperscalers like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud, is very hard because of technological gaps, the small size and lack of innovation of European providers, long-term contracts that lock in customers, higher transition costs (up to 20-30%), and complicated migration problems. Even with these problems, success would bring big benefits: better data privacy and security by keeping European data safe from foreign laws like the U.S. CLOUD Act, more freedom in international relations, less risk of U.S. policy changes or sanctions, new jobs, and a boost to local tech innovation and competitiveness. A successful European shift would mostly hurt the United States. For example, it would cost American cloud giants a lot of money (they currently control about 70–80% of the EU market), hurt their global market share, and hurt their ability to influence digital infrastructure around the world. It would also speed up the fragmentation of global technology, but it could also lead to more U.S. innovation through more competition and the growth of compliant offerings like sovereign cloud variants.