The current static MFA prompts significantly slow down developer workflows. Implement an adaptive MFA system that uses risk scores based on user behavior, device trust, and IP location to dynamically adjust authentication requirements. This should allow low-risk scenarios to skip prompts and high-risk scenarios to require stronger authentication like biometrics, and reduce the need for complex, numerous rules.
Looking at Okta to clean up user provisioning and app access. Need conditional access that blocks SaaS unless on company devices. Checking competitors too. Static MFA prompts slow devs down bad. Every git push needs approval. Rules stack up past 100 lines. SCIM fails half the SaaS apps. Legacy LDAP ties make federation rough. Adaptive MFA looks better with risk scores on user behavior, device trust, IP location. Low risk skips prompts. High risk jumps to biometrics. Rules cut to 20 smart ones. Few questions I’ve in my mind…: * Provisioning holds up across 50+ SaaS apps? * Device checks enforce mobile and cloud lockdown tight? * Adaptive MFA hits 80% adoption week one or stalls? * Migration path from legacy LDAP skips sprint waste? * Vendor lock traps you long term? Okta, Entra ID, or Ping work best for mixed Microsoft and SaaS stacks?