RequestHunt is a community-driven platform that collects and curates feature requests from X (Twitter), Reddit, and GitHub. We help product teams discover what features real users are asking for, making it easier to validate product ideas and prioritize feature development based on actual user demand.

How does RequestHunt collect feature requests?

RequestHunt uses AI-powered extraction to automatically collect feature requests from social media platforms including X, Reddit, and GitHub. The platform monitors discussions, issues, and posts to identify genuine user feature requests, extracting key information like the requested feature, product mentioned, and user sentiment.

Who uses RequestHunt?

RequestHunt is used by product managers, founders, developers, and product teams who want to discover what features real users are requesting. It's particularly valuable for startups looking to validate ideas, established companies prioritizing their roadmap, and developers building products that solve real user problems.

Is RequestHunt free to use?

Yes, browsing and searching feature requests on RequestHunt is completely free. We also offer API access for developers who want to integrate feature request data into their own applications. Check our pricing page for API plan details.

How often is RequestHunt data updated?

RequestHunt continuously collects feature requests from Reddit, X (Twitter), GitHub, YouTube, LinkedIn, and Amazon. You can also trigger on-demand scraping via the API or web interface to get the freshest data for any topic.

[Everything Claude Code] Define governance and visibility past the tool call

ECC currently helps at the point of tool invocation, but it still lacks a strong governance model for what happens after the tool call. This includes understanding who invoked a tool, what changed, what outputs were produced, and what approvals were required or bypassed.

Original Source

@@affaan-m | 0 pts | 3/13/2026

## Problem ECC currently helps at the point of tool invocation, but it still lacks a strong governance model for what happens after the tool call. Recurring product pressure is concentrated around questions like: - who or what invoked a tool - what changed as a result - what outputs were produced - what approvals were required, bypassed, or satisfied - what policy/security state applied after execution completed This gap affects both ECC 1.x and the ECC 2.0 control-plane direction. ## Scope Define a concrete governance model for post-tool execution visibility across local harness workflows. First-pass deliverables should cover: - actor identity for tool invocations (human, agent, subagent, automation) - execution records and artifact trails - approval and policy event modeling - post-call state transitions for sessions, tasks, and deliverables - how this appears in ECC 1.x docs/runtime versus ECC 2.0 operator surfaces ## Non-Goals - Full hosted governance backend in the same

Discussion

Loading comments...