User is seeking feedback on their accessibility checker plugin, Cirv Guard, specifically about the WCAG checks that matter most to users. They want to enhance the tool's effectiveness in identifying accessibility issues.
The two that are live right now: Cirv Box handles schema markup. It auto-generates JSON-LD for articles, WooCommerce products, FAQs (detects question-style headings on its own), breadcrumbs, how-to content, and your organization info. You toggle on what you want and it generates everything in the background. Detects Yoast and Rank Math if you're running either, avoids duplicating their schema. [wordpress.org/plugins/cirv-box](http://wordpress.org/plugins/cirv-box) Cirv Guard is an accessibility checker. Alt text, heading structure, color contrast, form labels, link accessibility. It runs a scan and gives you a report with what needs fixing. Just got approved on .org last week. [wordpress.org/plugins/cirv-guard](http://wordpress.org/plugins/cirv-guard) Two more are in the [WordPress.org](http://WordPress.org) review queue. Cirv Pulse monitors Core Web Vitals (LCP, INP, CLS) using the PageSpeed API right from your dashboard. Cirv Comply handles cookie consent with auto-categorization, consent logging, and a privacy policy generator for GDPR/CCPA. The reason they're all one brand: schema, accessibility, performance, and privacy are all things that fall under "compliance" in my head. Similar audience, similar workflow (scan site, find issues, fix them), and having them share a consistent admin UI makes sense to me. I'd really like feedback on Guard specifically if anyone tries it. Accessibility testing has a million edge cases and I know I haven't caught them all. What WCAG checks matter most to you?